Graham Foust. Necessary
Stranger. Flood Editions, 2007.
Review by Matthew
M. Gagnon
"Look at the
sky, go / back inside," opens Graham Foust's first poem, "1984,"
echoing a book of the same title by George Orwell, as well as a song by Van
Halen. These lines are emblematic of a larger trajectory that runs throughout
Foust's third collection of poems: the interiority of physical and mental
experience defined by a language of negativity (as in the profuse usage of
words such as "not," "never," "can't,"
"don't," and the prefix "un" that acts to interrogate what
gets said in a poem) and associative leaps that challenge immediate semantic
sense. All this is done within a formal environment of relying on short lines,
enjambment, white space, and a whole arsenal of strange verbal textures
juxtaposed to embody the poems.
In Necessary
Stranger, the titles of poems alone provide a frame from which they can
be read as a rhetorical questioning of our disparate social spaces and the
anxieties produced by them. While this questioning isn't so much explicitly
marshaled by a "direct treatment of the thing," it is done, on the
other hand, with a sense of linguistic metamorphosis: "When that glass
cocoons water // you dream wells so deep / they've stars (Bulimia)." Or
also consider from "A Note On Ontology":
Our voices are all
salt.
Our words keep
ramming
into nothing into
masks.
The sky is tar is
grass is trees.
The ground is cloud
is cold
is called
goodbye.
In this
environment, we become aware of the instability of language, how one word can
immediately be exchanged for another, or in another way, how context can be
readily shifted. The word "ramming" seems indicative of a blunt
dispossession of the contours of our speech habits and how these carry over as
communicative failures or insufficiencies. In this sense, the reality the poems
presuppose is highlighted in one of the epigraphs at the beginning of the book
drawn from Emily Dickinson: "Things are not what they." Foust's poems
amplify this statement by conjuring a possible space where emotive and physical
elements of a lived life qualify as a constellation of philosophical
speculations. This constellation can be best viewed as a process of thought
through the landscapes that make up our fleeting identities, which can be
contested spaces of paradox and indeterminacy:
This world is
conclusion. On a clear day, you can go
blind. The unknown
is almost
interesting, with
its infinite I'm-not-
kidding . Who are
you.
("Interstate Eighty")
This stanza begins
as a recasting of a Dickinson poem, "This world is not conclusion,"
and employs a clear rebuttal to the initial statement, ending with a question
that is not so much a question rather than a demand to know. By the quick turn
of a couple of lines, the speaker is able to create a state of confusion where
blindness and the unknown can bounce off each other as echo and as affirmation.
This particular poem ends with the oddly phrased, "There's no beginning to
decay," as a nod towards a reality of flux that is juxtaposed with the
"they're only facts," of the poem.
Another way to put Necessary Stranger into context is to
look at how many of the poems act to unsettle the reader's idea of semantic
sense and logic. In a poem such as "Herein," the speaker states:
"You look up-and-gutted- / of waves." Then the speaker commands and
states: "Afford morning. You are blind / as a mouth. // You are /
inconsequentially shrill." This movement, here, gives the pronoun
"you" a doubleness that can function as a direct address to the
reader and as interchangeable with the speaker of the poem. The density of the
phrasing allows for ambiguity that can't be easily resolved, but put into a
kind of register that can construct multiple meanings.
As the poem "Day Job" states: "The unconscious is structured / like a bladder." The implication of this may be regarded as an interiority where the speaker is in the process of thinking, thereby peeling back layer after layer of skin to get at the root of the matter. Within the white space that enlarges the scope of a poem is what's between the words. If language has any agency, Foust makes an unsettling contribution to our contemporary dystopia, only that in the end, it's more real than imagined.